Mississauga needs solutions

And successful housing options are about more than increasing supply—it’s about creating complete communities where people of every age and income can thrive. 

I support increasing housing choices through: 
-Missing starter and middle-income housing  
-Townhomes and Multiplexes  
-Mid-rise developments  
-Community-oriented neighbourhoods  
-Cooperative housing  
-Supportive housing  
-Multi-generational home units

Housing should allow seniors to downsize without leaving their neighbourhood, young families to find attainable homes, and workers to live closer to where they work. 

Mississauga News — 2026 Municipal Election Candidate Bios and Issue Questions

Current occupation: Mother of two, Part-time Transition Team Member with Gordons Real Estate Brokerage and Part-time Driver for Zoom Dealer Trades

Which ward do you live in and how long have you lived in Mississauga:

I returned to Mississauga in 2023, and this is where I have chosen to put down roots and continue contributing to the community I have called home for much of my life.

When I initially entered the mayoral race, I saw it as an opportunity to meet residents, build relationships and better understand the issues facing communities across Mississauga. Through that process, I connected with Chief Barry Gilbert of Eagle Spirits of the Great Waters, based in Port Credit.

From the beginning, I knew that I wanted Indigenous voices and perspectives to be part of my approach. First, because we live in Canada and I believe we have a responsibility to listen to the First Peoples who know and have cared for this land for generations. Second, this is deeply personal to me because my children are Indigenous.

Although I currently live in Ward 8, my conversations with Chief Barry led to a discussion about Ward 1 and the opportunity to serve the communities of Port Credit, Lakeview, Dixie and Mineola. Chief Barry encouraged me to make the change and run for Councillor, believing that I could bring a different perspective and that Ward 1 was ready for change. He has since fully endorsed my campaign.

I had also hoped to move to Port Credit this past spring, but unfortunately, the opportunity did not work out. I remain committed to Ward 1 and to building strong relationships with the residents and communities I hope to represent.

I was born and raised in Mississauga and attended Peel schools from kindergarten through high school. After high school, I lived at home and commuted to Seneca College, where I studied Aviation for one semester before completing my Marketing Diploma at Humber College. I later earned my Bachelor of Commerce in Entrepreneurial Management from Royal Roads University in Victoria, BC.

After graduating, I began my career in Vancouver before eventually returning to Mississauga. Through work and life, I have also had the privilege of being part of other communities, including New Westminster and Kelowna, BC, as well as Ottawa and St. Catharines, Ontario.

Those experiences have given me the opportunity to see how different communities approach growth, transportation, housing and community-building—and I want to bring those perspectives home to Mississauga.

Previous political experience:

Although I do not have previous experience holding political office, I have spent many years involved in my communities through volunteer work, parent council, fundraising, seniors’ services, youth programs, and community organizations.

My professional background has also given me experience that I believe translates well to public service. I have worked in project coordination, operations, finance, engineering consulting, hospitality, and nonprofit environments, where I have managed budgets, coordinated teams and projects, worked with diverse stakeholders, solved problems, and helped turn ideas into action.

As a Parent Council Treasurer, I was involved in fundraising, financial oversight, and decisions about how funds could best support students and families. I have also volunteered with organizations and initiatives supporting children, seniors, families, and the broader community.

I am now taking the next step from community involvement to public service. I believe good municipal leadership starts with listening, understanding the issues that affect people in their everyday lives, and then working collaboratively with councillors from all Wards to find practical solutions.

I want to revisit the Major Transit Station Area plans and policies guiding new development to ensure they reflect the needs of local residents and transit users, and that growth is supported by proper infrastructure, transit, roads, schools, parks and services residents need. This includes looking carefully at the City’s budgets for essential services such as police and fire, and asking where improvements or efficiencies can be made.  I want to advocate for improvements and accessibility for future residents of Lakeview Village and Brightwater-area developments. I also believe developers should contribute fairly to the infrastructure costs created by new growth. 

Ward 1 needs a wider range of housing options for people at different stages of life and income levels, including affordable, cooperative, community and supportive housing, as well as options for seniors, families, young people and multi-generational households. We should also explore underused spaces, older plazas, vacant properties and appropriate parking areas while protecting green space. 

I want to examine where the City can reduce unnecessary spending, improve efficiency and find opportunities to support local businesses, attract investment and create good local jobs without placing unnecessary pressure on taxpayers. I would advocate for responsible budgeting and explore whether a tax freeze can be achieved while maintaining essential services. 

I want to work with Peel Regional Police, schools, community organizations and service providers to strengthen prevention, address root causes and use resources effectively. Expanding access to housing, youth programs, employment and community services can help build stronger, safer communities. 

1- Public safety & police funding: Mississauga residents have raised growing concerns about auto thefts, porch pirates and robberies, while reporting a lack of visible enforcement. At the same time, Peel Regional Police budget has continued to grow. As a councillor, you would have a direct vote on the police budget. What specific steps would you take to address public safety concerns? 1a. How will you ensure residents see value from police funding/spending?

Public safety starts with transparency, communication and accountability. Residents should know what programs are being funded, where police resources are being deployed, and what results those investments are achieving. Communities should also be informed when there will be increased police presence in areas experiencing concerns.  

I would support a stronger focus on prevention and youth engagement. Working with schools, community centres, local organizations and businesses, we can develop more after-school programs, mentorship and co-op opportunities. Police staff who want to participate could volunteer their time to coach or mentor youth on topics such as safety, leadership, careers and community service.  

I would also explore proven tools and partnerships to address property crime, including bait cars and GPS tracking technology where appropriate, as well as practical measures such as secure, larger parcel drop-off boxes in areas experiencing frequent porch thefts.  

A) For non-emergency issues, I would work with Peel Regional Police to better understand call volumes, response times and which concerns can be addressed through other community services. Where appropriate, I would support partnerships with community officers, mental-health professionals and other specialized support workers so police are not the only response to issues that require a different type of expertise.  

Residents deserve measurable results. I would advocate for transparent reporting on police presence, response times, crime trends, enforcement outcomes and community programs, so taxpayers can see where their money is going and what it is accomplishing.   

2-  Road safety: Following the province’s ban on automated speed enforcement cameras in November 2025, Mississauga has been installing replacement road safety measures, some of which city staff acknowledge have limited data to show their effectiveness. Residents also raise concerns about road rage and deteriorating driving conditions. What would you do as a councillor to improve road safety in Mississauga?

Road safety starts with understanding what is actually working. With automated speed enforcement no longer available, I would want the City to be transparent about the effectiveness of replacement measures and use data to determine where additional action is needed. The City should measure changes in speeds, collisions, near-misses and driver behaviour, not simply install infrastructure and assume it is working. 

I would support a combination of targeted traffic calming, better signage, improved lighting, raised crosswalks, speed displays and other physical measures in areas with demonstrated safety concerns. The City is already using provincial funding for upgrades in school and Community Safety Zones, and I would work with residents and staff to ensure Ward 1 receives appropriate improvements. 

I would also advocate for stronger enforcement of dangerous driving, including speeding, aggressive driving and distracted driving, working with Peel Regional Police where enforcement is required. 

Road safety also means maintaining the roads themselves. I would push for better communication and faster action on potholes, deteriorating pavement, damaged sidewalks, poor lighting and unsafe intersections, particularly where residents have repeatedly raised concerns. 

Finally, I would listen to residents. People who walk, cycle, drive, use transit and cross our roads every day often identify safety problems before they appear in collision statistics. 

3- E-scooters: E-scooter injuries in Mississauga have risen more than 113 per cent between 2023 and 2025, according to data from Trillium Health Partners. Municipalities have authority under Ontario’s e-scooter pilot program to set bylaws governing where e-scooters operate, where they park, and whether operators need a licence or insurance. However, under the Highway Traffic Act, enforcement of moving violations can only be carried out by police. What specific steps would you take as a councillor to address e-scooter safety?

With e-scooter injuries increasing, I would focus on education, accountability and closing enforcement gaps. 

First, I would work with our schools and community centres to develop an e-scooter safety program similar to the bicycle-safety and helmet programs many of us grew up with. Students should learn the rules of the road, helmet use, visibility, responsible riding and the consequences of unsafe behaviour before they start riding. 

For rental scooters, I would work with the City and operators to strengthen rental protocols. Before someone begins a rental, there should be a quick safety and rules check, including confirmation of age and acknowledgement of local bylaws. Operators should also be held accountable for repeat violations. 

For privately owned scooters, I would explore whether a licensing or registration system could be implemented within municipal and provincial authority, including age verification, safety information and confirmation that owners understand the rules. 

I would also work with Peel Regional Police and the Province to address the enforcement gap between municipal bylaws and the Highway Traffic Act. If police are required for moving violations, we need to ensure residents know who is responsible for enforcement and how violations are addressed. 

Mississauga already has strong basic rules including: a minimum age of 16, restrictions on sidewalks and a 24 km/h maximum speed. The priority should be making sure those rules are understood, followed and consistently enforced. 

4- Bike lanes & cycling infrastructure: Mississauga’s Cycling Master Plan proposes 175.8 kilometres of new and upgraded cycling infrastructure at an estimated cost of $97.5 million over five years. Recently, cycling infrastructure was removed from Aquitaine Avenue and a similar change is planned for Argentia Road. Do you support the current Cycling Master Plan as proposed?4a. How would you ensure cycling infrastructure spending delivers value for taxpayers?

I support creating safer transportation options for people who want to cycle, but I do not support the Cycling Master Plan as proposed at this time. If we are investing significant taxpayer dollars in cycling infrastructure while some recently installed lanes are being removed, I think we need to step back and make sure we are getting the planning right. 

Before committing to $97.5 million, I would want more research and community consultation on how the infrastructure will actually be used, maintained and connected over time. We need to look at how cycling routes interact with traffic, local businesses, schools, neighbourhoods and transit including: GO, MiWay and future LRT connections. 

We should also plan for the practical realities of cycling in Mississauga: winter maintenance, repairs, water stations, secure bike storage and connections to transit stations. Infrastructure should not end abruptly or leave cyclists without a safe way to reach their destination. 

A) Value means building infrastructure that people can use, not spending taxpayers‘ money to remove or redesign it. 

Before approving major projects, I would want clear objectives, projected usage, cost estimates, maintenance requirements and measurable outcomes. After projects are completed, the City should track usage and safety and publicly report whether those goals are being met. 

If we plan properly, connect communities and build infrastructure where there is demonstrated demand, the usage will speak for itself. I want cycling investments to be practical, connected and built to last, not simply kilometres of infrastructure for the sake of meeting a target. 

5- Public transit: Mississauga remains one of Canada’s most car-dependent cities, with ongoing coverage gaps and service frequency concerns on MiWay. What would you do as a councillor to improve transit access and reliability?5a. Do you support expanding the MiWay network?

I would focus on making transit useful for the trips residents actually need to make every day. That means looking beyond major routes and improving local connections within neighbourhoods. 

I would support more frequent, reliable shorter local routes connecting residents to schools, community centres, shopping areas, employment and major transit hubs. During peak work and school hours, I would also look at more express and limited-stop service where there is demonstrated demand, helping residents travel longer distances efficiently. 

My perspective is also shaped by my own experience living in other Canadian cities. While living in New Westminster, I experienced first hand how SkyTrain connections can make it much easier to move between communities. In Ottawa, I experienced the importance of connecting LRT service to major destinations. And while living in Vancouver, I saw how the Canada Line provides an efficient connection between the airport and the communities it serves. These experiences show me that transit works best when the entire network is planned around how people actually move. 

We also need better options for residents who cannot easily use conventional transit, including seniors and TransHelp users. 

A) Yes, I support expanding MiWay, but it should be strategic. I would first look at the overall network alongside Major Transit Station Areas, higher-density development, schools, employment areas, community amenities, GO and the future LRT. 

New development should have transit planned from the beginning, with reliable connections and Plan B options when major routes are delayed or disrupted. 

6- Affordable housing: Mississauga is facing a housing affordability crisis, with average rents significantly above what many moderate-income residents can afford. What specific steps would you take as a councillor to push for affordable housing supply, not just market-rate housing, in Mississauga?

We need to build more housing, but simply adding market-rate units will not solve affordability for families, seniors and moderate-income residents. I would focus on creating a range of housing options and ownership models. 

First, I would work with developers, the City, Peel and other levels of government to expand rent-to-own, co-operative housing, income-based and below-market rentals, affordable seniors’ communities and family-oriented housing. I would also explore programs such as mortgage assumption and government-supported lease-to-own models that can help people move from renting into ownership. I would like to see more targeted opportunities for single parents, Indigenous people, seniors, young families, multi-generational and moderate-income households.  

I would also explore ways to make better use of existing housing stock. Large family homes could, where appropriate, be converted into several smaller, self-contained private units, creating additional rental housing within established neighbourhoods. This could provide options for seniors, students, single parents and young people while allowing homeowners to generate income or accommodate multiple generations. These conversions must still meet appropriate requirements for fire safety, entrances, parking, servicing, privacy and building standards. 

I would also review Mississauga’s short-term rental rules. The City already requires short-term rentals to be licensed and limits them to a principal residence. I would look at whether stronger enforcement or further restrictions on commercial-style short-term rentals could return more homes to the long-term rental market, while assessing the actual impact on supply before making changes. 

Finally, I would support incentives that require a meaningful affordability component. 

7- Property standards: Property standards complaints have been rising citywide. A pilot enforcement program launched in Ward 5 in 2025 generated more than 22,000 parking tickets, yet residents say they have not seen noticeable changes in their neighbourhoods. How would you address property standards issues across the city?7a. What would effective city-wide enforcement look like if you are elected?

Every neighbourhood is different, and I don’t believe a single enforcement program will solve every property standards issue across Mississauga. I would want to understand what is causing the problem in each community and what solution will actually address it. 

For example, if parking is the issue, we should look at whether there is simply not enough parking, whether rental properties are creating additional demand, or whether vehicles are being improperly stored. Solutions could include clearly designated parking spaces, identifying nearby parking opportunities, and working with property owners to remove abandoned or scrap vehicles. 

For neglected lawns and properties, I would look at opportunities for community partnerships and neighbourhood programs that encourage residents to work together to maintain shared standards, while still enforcing bylaws when necessary; for example, programs like “less lawn, more life” and community garden programs.  

For garbage and large-item disposal, particularly in areas with larger rental populations or frequent tenant turnover, I would look at whether additional bins, larger collection capacity or targeted bulk-item collection around common moving periods would reduce illegal dumping. 

A) I would start with data: identify the most common complaints in each area, understand their causes, and then match enforcement and services to the problem. 

Effective enforcement should be consistent, visible and fair, but it should also address the source of the problem rather than simply issuing tickets. I would want residents to know where to report concerns, receive updates on how they are being addressed, and see measurable results. 

8- Infill development: A recent infill development has raised questions by residents on construction oversight and damage to neighbouring properties. What protocols would you advocate for to ensure residents are protected during construction? 8a. What will you do to ensure homeowners have clear recourse when damage occurs?I support well-planned infill developments, particularly when it can add much-needed housing without unnecessarily expanding the City’s footprint. However, I believe Mississauga has moved quickly to accommodate growth, and we need to make sure construction oversight and protections for existing residents keep pace with development. 

Before approving significant projects, I would support stronger due diligence on developers and construction companies, including their track record, experience, financial capacity and ability to complete projects responsibly. This is particularly important when new entities are being proposed to build and manage rental housing. 

I would also advocate for stronger enforcement of construction bylaws covering noise, dust, vibration, water use, drainage, construction waste, site access and hours of operation, with meaningful fees or penalties when requirements are not followed. Construction oversight should not end once a permit is issued. 

A) Neighbours should not be left to fight a developer on their own when construction damages their property. I would advocate for mandatory pre-construction condition assessments and appropriate insurance or financial security from developers, so there is a clear record of neighbouring properties before work begins and resources available to address legitimate damage. 

For major projects or prolonged construction disturbances, I would also explore whether a neighbourhood impact or compensation framework could be established where appropriate and legally permitted. 

Finally, I see infill development as an opportunity to negotiate better community benefits, including affordable housing, rental options and appropriate amenities, rather than simply adding density.